CAEP accreditation is the nationally recognized quality seal for educator preparation providers in the United States. Formed in 2013 from the merger of NCATE and TEAC, the Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation is recognized by CHEA and sets the standard for teacher and educator preparation at the bachelor’s, master’s, and doctoral levels. Expert Education Consultants, led by Dr. Sandra Norderhaug (30 years in higher education leadership), has guided 115+ institutions through licensing and accreditation.

What Is CAEP?

The Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP) is a programmatic (specialized) accreditor based in Washington, D.C. that evaluates colleges, schools, and departments of education within universities — not entire institutions. Think of CAEP as the quality seal telling state licensing boards, hiring principals, and prospective teacher candidates: this program produces educators who actually know their content and can teach it.

CAEP was formed in 2013 when the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE) and the Teacher Education Accreditation Council (TEAC) merged. By 2016, CAEP became the sole specialized accreditor for educator preparation. It holds recognition from the Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) and is referenced by many state departments of education when approving teacher licensure programs.

As of fall 2025, 544 educator preparation providers hold CAEP accreditation across all 50 states and internationally. CAEP accredits programs at the initial licensure level (undergraduate and post-baccalaureate teacher preparation) and the advanced level (master’s, specialist, and doctoral programs for practicing educators). The accreditation cycle runs seven years, with annual reporting in between.

DetailInformation
Founded2013 (merger of NCATE, est. 1954, and TEAC)
HeadquartersWashington, D.C.
RecognitionCouncil for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA)
ScopeProgrammatic accreditor for educator preparation providers (EPPs)
Program LevelsBachelor, post-bac, master, specialist, doctoral — initial and advanced
Geographic ScopeAll 50 U.S. states plus international; 544 EPPs as of fall 2025
Cycle7 years with annual reporting
Current Standards2022 Revised Standards (initial and advanced)
Program ReviewSPA review, state review, or CAEP evidence review of Standard 1
Key DistinctionProgrammatic only — institutions still need regional or national accreditation
Wondering if CAEP is the right accreditor for your educator preparation programs? Book a free strategy call and we’ll help you evaluate.
Book a Strategy Call →

Is CAEP the Right Accreditor for You?

CAEP is purpose-built for educator preparation providers — colleges, schools, and departments that train teachers and other school professionals. It is not an institutional accreditor and won’t replace regional or national accreditation. Quick self-assessment:

✓ CAEP Is a Good Fit If…
  • You offer teacher licensure or certification programs (elementary, secondary, special education, etc.)
  • Your state requires or strongly recommends CAEP accreditation for EPPs
  • You want graduates eligible for licensure in multiple states without additional hurdles
  • You offer advanced educator programs (leadership, counseling, reading, curriculum & instruction)
  • You are a freestanding EPP seeking Title IV access through CAEP accreditation
  • You want the most recognized educator preparation accreditation in the U.S.
✗ CAEP May Not Be Right If…
  • Your institution does not offer any educator preparation programs
  • You are a trade school or vocational institution without teacher education
  • You need institutional accreditation (CAEP is programmatic only)
  • Your education programs are non-credit professional development only
  • You have fewer than one cohort of completers — CAEP requires outcome data
  • You are unwilling to invest in robust data collection for candidate and P-12 impact

CAEP’s 2022 Revised Standards

CAEP’s current standards — the 2022 Revised Standards, in effect for all reviews from spring 2022 onward — are organized into five core standards for initial-level programs, plus two situational standards. Advanced-level programs have a parallel set. What evaluators look for:

Standard R1
Content & Pedagogical Knowledge
Candidates understand their subject matter and can teach it effectively to diverse P-12 students. Evidence covers learner development, content knowledge, instructional practice, and professional responsibility — aligned to InTASC. Equity, diversity, and technology integration required.
Standard R2
Clinical Partnerships & Practice
The EPP maintains meaningful partnerships with P-12 schools. Clinical educators are co-selected and prepared. Candidates get diverse, sustained classroom experiences of sufficient depth, breadth, and duration. Partners share responsibility for continuous improvement.
Standard R3
Candidate Recruitment, Progression & Support
The EPP recruits high-quality, diverse candidates and monitors progress from admission through completion. A cohort GPA of 3.0 at a transition point is required. Disaggregated data by race and ethnicity must be tracked. Complaint records must be maintained.
Standard R4
Program Impact
Completers effectively contribute to P-12 student-learning growth. Employers and completers report satisfaction with preparation quality. This is the “show me the results” standard — multiple measures of impact required.
Standard R5
Quality Assurance & Continuous Improvement
The EPP maintains a functioning quality assurance system with valid, actionable data. Internal and external stakeholders participate in evaluation. The EPP shows systematic, evidence-based improvement over time with documented modifications.
Standards R6 & R7
Fiscal Capacity & Title IV Compliance
R6: Adequate budget, faculty, facilities, and administrative leadership. If your parent institution holds recognized regional accreditation, that satisfies R6 automatically. R7: Only for freestanding EPPs seeking Title IV — must demonstrate 100% Title IV compliance.
Advanced-level programs (RA.1 through RA.5) follow a parallel framework emphasizing deeper content expertise, advanced clinical practice, candidate selectivity at the graduate level, completer and employer satisfaction, and a quality assurance system incorporating advanced-level outcomes.

Key Evidence to Prepare

CAEP doesn’t prescribe a rigid exhibit list, but your Self-Study Report must include evidence for every standard component. The most critical documentation categories:

Evidence CategoryWhat You NeedHow We Help
Candidate Assessment DataLicensure exam pass rates, GPA at transition points, key assessment scores, disaggregated by race/ethnicity and programDesign data collection and format evidence for AIMS 2.0
Clinical Partnership AgreementsFormal MOUs with partner schools, co-selection protocols for clinical educators, evidence of mutual benefitDraft partnership templates and document co-construction
Completer Impact EvidenceP-12 student learning growth data, classroom observation results, value-added measures where availableBuild impact measurement frameworks and collect results
Employer & Completer SurveysSatisfaction survey instruments and results from employers and from completers themselvesCreate survey instruments, manage distribution, analyze data
Curriculum DocumentationProgram descriptions, syllabi, learning outcome maps, credit-hour policies, gen-ed requirementsAlign curricula to standards and prepare documentation
Faculty CredentialsCVs, transcripts, evaluations, professional development records for all EPP facultyCompile credential files and identify qualification gaps
Recruitment & Diversity PlansGoals and progress evidence for recruiting diverse candidates reflecting P-12 demographicsDevelop recruitment strategies and track disaggregated data
Quality Assurance SystemWritten QAS plan, data entry and reporting processes, evidence of data-informed decisionsBuild or refine your QAS from the ground up
Annual Report DataEight annual accountability measures: completion, licensure, employment, consumer infoPrepare compliant annual reports in AIMS 2.0
Program Review ReportsSPA reports, state review results, or CAEP evidence review for each program areaGuide SPA submissions and evidence organization

The CAEP Accreditation Timeline

Expect 2–4 years from application to initial accreditation decision. For reaffirmation, EPPs operate on a 7-year cycle with annual reporting. A realistic phase-by-phase breakdown:

Phase 1
Application & Eligibility
3–6 months
Submit Part 1 and Part 2 applications. CAEP reviews eligibility and grants “Approved Applicant” status. Part 2 must complete within 365 days of Part 1 acceptance. With our consulting team, typically 2–4 months.
Phase 2
Program Review
6–12 months
Complete the required program review option (SPA review, state review, or CAEP evidence review of Standard 1). Programs submit content and pedagogy evidence. Typically 4–8 months with our support.
Phase 3
Self-Study & Evidence Building
12–18 months
The most intensive phase. Gather evidence across all standards. Build the Self-Study Report (SSR) in CAEP’s AIMS 2.0 system. Collect candidate outcome data, employer surveys, clinical partnership documentation, and QAS evidence. 8–12 months with our support.
Phase 4
Formative Review (Offsite)
1–2 months
CAEP assigns a peer review team that conducts an offsite formative review of your SSR. The team identifies preliminary Areas for Improvement (AFIs) and Stipulations, and sets the focus for the site visit.
Phase 5
Site Visit (Virtual or On-Site)
2–3 days
The evaluation team (typically 5 reviewers) verifies evidence, interviews faculty, candidates, employers, and P-12 partners, reviews pedagogical artifacts, and assesses compliance. For 2025–2026, all CAEP reviews are virtual.
Phase 6
Rejoinder Response
30 days
You receive the Site Review Report and may submit a written rejoinder addressing factual errors or providing additional evidence. We draft this response to maximize your case.
Phase 7
Accreditation Council Decision
1–3 months to next meeting
The CAEP Accreditation Council meets in the fall and spring to make final decisions: Accreditation, Accreditation with Stipulations, Probationary Accreditation, or Denial. Initial accreditation is granted for 7 years.
With Expert Education Consultants’ support, EPPs compress the preparation timeline by 4–8 months by avoiding common pitfalls: incomplete evidence portfolios, misaligned survey instruments, and weak quality assurance documentation. We have guided 18 first-time accreditations to a clean decision with zero critical findings.

CAEP Accreditation Fees (2025–2026)

All fees below are paid directly to CAEP. Source: caepnet.org

Annual EPP Fees (Based on Number of Completers)

Completer RangeAnnual Domestic FeeAnnual International Fee
0–50$3,250$8,250
51–150$3,605$8,605
151–300$4,120$9,120
301–500$4,755$9,755
501–1,000$6,290$11,290
1,000+$7,310$12,310

Accreditation Review Fees

Fee CategoryAmountNotes
Review Fee (Per Reviewer)$2,510Typically 5 reviewers assigned = ~$12,550 total
Travel Expenses (Per Reviewer)$850N/A for virtual reviews (all 2025–2026 reviews are virtual)
Additional Reviewers$2,510 eachMay be added for EPPs with 500+ completers, 20+ programs, or multiple sites
Fewer ReviewersReduced totalPossible for EPPs with <10 programs, joint CAEP/state reviews, or stipulation reviews
Important: These are CAEP’s fees paid directly to the accreditor. Our consulting fees are separate and customized to each institution. Contact us for a personalized quote after a free consultation.
Budgeting for CAEP accreditation consulting? We provide transparent, itemized proposals after your free strategy call.
Get a Custom Quote →

How Expert Education Consultants Help You Achieve CAEP Accreditation

🔍
Readiness Assessment
Review your evidence, data systems, and policies against all CAEP standards. Receive a detailed roadmap prioritizing the gaps most likely to produce Areas for Improvement or Stipulations.
📊
Evidence Architecture
Design the data infrastructure you need: completer surveys, employer satisfaction instruments, P-12 impact measures, clinical partnership agreements, and disaggregated candidate tracking.
📂
Program Review Support
Whether you pursue SPA review, state review, or CAEP evidence review, we guide evidence compilation for every program area and draft narratives and assessment data.
✍️
Self-Study Report Drafting
Write and organize the SSR in CAEP’s AIMS 2.0 system, ensuring every standard is addressed with clear evidence and compelling narrative. We handle the technical formatting.
🎓
Site Visit Preparation
Mock interviews, presentation coaching, evidence organization (virtual or physical), and logistics planning. We prepare faculty, candidates, and P-12 partners for reviewer questions.
📈
Decision & Follow-Up
After the site review, we draft your rejoinder response and guide you through the Accreditation Council decision. If stipulations are issued, we develop your resolution plan.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does an accreditation consultant do?

An accreditation consultant guides your institution through every phase — readiness assessment, self-study drafting, evidence organization, site visit prep, and Accreditation Council action. The right consultant compresses your timeline and translates standards into a defensible self-study.

What is the difference between CAEP and NCATE?

CAEP replaced NCATE (and TEAC) in 2013 as the sole specialized accreditor for educator preparation. NCATE-accredited institutions transitioned to CAEP at their next cycle. The 2022 CAEP standards are more streamlined than the old NCATE standards and emphasize candidate impact on P-12 student learning, diversity, and continuous improvement.

Does CAEP accreditation replace regional accreditation?

No. CAEP is a programmatic (specialized) accreditor. It accredits your educator preparation programs, not your entire institution. Most universities holding CAEP accreditation also hold regional accreditation (SACSCOC, HLC, MSCHE, WSCUC, NECHE, NWCCU). If your institution is regionally accredited, CAEP considers that sufficient for Standard 6 (Fiscal and Administrative Capacity).

How long does CAEP accreditation last?

CAEP accreditation is granted for a seven-year term. Between reviews, EPPs must submit annual reports with eight accountability measures. If an EPP receives Accreditation with Stipulations, it typically has two years to resolve the stipulated areas before the next review.

What are CAEP’s annual accountability measures?

CAEP requires eight annual measures: (1) completer effectiveness based on P-12 student learning, (2) completer effectiveness from observations or other measures, (3) employer satisfaction, (4) completer satisfaction, (5) graduation rates, (6) licensure/certification pass rates, (7) employment rates in the field, and (8) consumer information including student loan default rates.

Can online educator preparation programs earn CAEP accreditation?

Yes. CAEP accredits EPPs regardless of delivery modality — face-to-face, online, or hybrid. The EPP must demonstrate that clinical experiences (student teaching, field placements) are of sufficient quality and depth regardless of how coursework is delivered. Candidate identity verification for online coursework is required.

What happens if my EPP does not meet a CAEP standard?

Deficiencies are documented as Areas for Improvement (AFIs) or Stipulations. An AFI signals a weakness that needs monitoring. A Stipulation is more serious — the standard is not met and must be resolved, usually within two years. In severe cases, the Accreditation Council may place an EPP on Probation or deny accreditation.

How do I prepare for an accreditation site visit?

Successful site visit prep includes a complete self-study and exhibit inventory 8–12 weeks ahead; mock interviews for faculty, candidates, and P-12 partners; rehearsed answers to evidence-anchored questions; on-site logistics for the peer team; and an evidence room where any document can be produced in minutes.

Is CAEP accreditation required?

It depends on your state. Many states require or strongly recommend CAEP accreditation for educator preparation providers. In some states, graduates of non-CAEP-accredited programs face additional hurdles to licensure. CAEP maintains partnership agreements with state education agencies defining how accreditation integrates with state program approval.

Ready to start?

Begin your CAEP accreditation journey with expert guidance.

115+ institutions successfully launched. 18 first-time accreditations guided to a clean decision with zero critical findings. As your CAEP accreditation consultant, we partner with educator preparation providers from readiness assessment through Accreditation Council decision.